I have always considered myself a
traditional illustrator. I love watercolor, pastel and pencil and love what traditional
materials do. In fact, I can completely nerd out and spend hours obsessing over
paint properties, paper surfaces, and line weight. I love the
unpredictability of traditional materials and have never rendered e a book
digitally because frankly, I am lame when it comes to technology. However, I am part of a wonderful critique
group: Lisa Brown, Katherine Tillotson, Christy Hale, Ashley Wolff and Susan
Gal, and each uses digital tools differently. So, I became interested in the
flexibility that working with digital tools affords me and I explored those
options with my latest book, Lotus and
Feather.
|
proofs |
My biggest goal, when I started the
project, was to retain what I love about working traditionally, but add the
flexibility that digital allows. I also wanted to experiment using different paper surfaces to achieve
looser and tighter images, so I began to experiment with creating art
traditionally and combining it digitally.
I started rendering loose backgrounds
with watercolor on 140 pound cold press watercolor paper. I did the paintings
onsite and each one took about 5 minutes.
I scanned the backgrounds at 600
dpi and they became the basis for the landscapes in
Lotus and Feather.
|
background watercolor |
I experimented with hot press
illustration paper, and rendered the bird and the characters on this surface. Hot press paper allows you to render
incredible detail with pencil and paint and not have any of the paper texture
show. I scanned all of these drawings into the computer too.
|
watercolors on hot press paper |
I also painted a number of simple textures on different types of paper. Sunsets, reeds, weird textures like ink and soap bubbles ( a texture from critique group member Susan Gal) and scanned them all into the computer.
|
sumi ink, watercolor, salt |
|
this texture was great as water. |
Because I have worked
traditionally and I paint my watercolors in layers, I replicated the same thing
digitally. Often the files consisted of 70 layers, all transparent (the
multiply layer... my favorite). I inverted layers, duplicated layers and after
a while it felt like painting. The process wasn't faster, but in
many ways I had more control over color and composition.The process was also wonderful when
it came to changes. In the past, minor changes meant redoing a painting that
took a week to paint. Now it meant, finding and redoing one layer. A much faster and simpler process!
|
Final Art |